Àá½Ã¸¸ ±â´Ù·Á ÁÖ¼¼¿ä. ·ÎµùÁßÀÔ´Ï´Ù.

ÃøµÎÇϾÇÀå¾Ö ȯÀÚ¿¡¼­ ÁÖ°üÀû Áõ»ó°ú ÀÓ»ó°Ë»ç ¼Ò°ß °£ÀÇ ÀÏÄ¡¼º

Correspondence between Temporomandibular Disorder Symptoms and Clinical Examination Findings

´ëÇѱ¸°­³»°úÇÐȸÁö 2010³â 35±Ç 1È£ p.83 ~ 91
ÀÓ¿µ°ü, ¹éÇý¼º, ±èº´±¹,
¼Ò¼Ó »ó¼¼Á¤º¸
ÀÓ¿µ°ü ( Im Yeong-Gwan ) - Àü³²´ëÇб³º´¿ø ±¸°­³»°ú
¹éÇý¼º ( Baek Hey-Sung ) - ÇѾç´ëÇб³ ÀÇ°ú´ëÇÐ ¼Ò¾Æ°úÇб³½Ç
±èº´±¹ ( Kim Byung-Gook ) - Àü³²´ëÇб³ Ä¡ÀÇÇÐÀü¹®´ëÇпø ±¸°­³»°úÇб³½Ç

Abstract

¸ñÀû : ÃøµÎÇϾÇÀå¾Ö ȯÀÚ¿¡¼­ ´Ù¾çÇÑ Áõ»óÀÇ ¾ç»óÀ» Æò°¡ÇÏ°í, ÃøµÎÇϾÇÀå¾Ö Áõ»ó°ú ÀÓ»ó°Ë»ç ¼Ò°ß °£ÀÇ ÀÏÄ¡ Á¤µµ¸¦ Æò°¡ÇÏ°íÀÚ ÇÏ¿´´Ù.

Àç·á ¹× ¹æ¹ý: ÃÑ 218¸íÀÇ È¯ÀÚ(¿©ÀÚ 143¸í, ³²ÀÚ 75¸í, Æò±Õ ¿¬·É 31.3 ¡¾ 14.0¼¼)¸¦ ´ë»óÀ¸·Î ÇÏ¿´À¸¸ç, ¼³¹®Áö ÀÛ¼º, ÀÓ»ó°Ë»ç ¹× ¹æ»ç¼± °Ë»ç¸¦ ¼öÇàÇÏ¿´´Ù. Áõ»óÀÇ ¹ß»ý ½Ã±â ¹× À§Ä¡¸¦ Æ÷ÇÔÇÏ¿© ÁÖ¼Ò¿Í °ü·ÃµÈ ¸ðµç Áõ»óÀ» ¹®ÁøÇÏ¿´´Ù. ÀÓ»ó°Ë»ç·Î´Â °³±¸·® ÃøÁ¤, ¾Ç°üÀý ÀâÀ½ ÃËÁø, ¾Ç°üÀý ¹× ÀúÀÛ±Ù ÃËÁø °Ë»ç¸¦ ÇÏ¿´´Ù. ÃËÁø¿¡ ÀÇÇÑ ¾ÐÅë°Ë»ç °á°ú¼öÄ¡¸¦ ÀÌ¿ëÇÏ¿© ¾ÐÅëÁ¡¼öÇÕÀ» ±¸ÇÏ¿´´Ù.

°á°ú : ÅëÁõÀÌ °¡Àå ÈçÇÑ Áõ»óÀ̾úÀ¸¸ç(78.9%), ´ÙÀ½À¸·Î ¾Ç°üÀý ÀâÀ½(45.4%), ±×¸®°í °³±¸ Á¦ÇÑ(17.0%) ¼øÀ¸·Î ÈçÇÏ¿´´Ù. ÅÎÀÇ ÅëÁõÀÌ ÅëÁõ Áõ»ó ºÎÀ§ÀÇ 91.9%¸¦ Â÷ÁöÇÏ¿´´Ù. ÁÖ°üÀûÀÎ ÅÎÀÇ ÅëÁõ °­µµ´Â ´ëºÎºÐÀÇ È¯ÀÚ¿¡¼­ ³·°Å³ª Áߵ¿´À¸¸ç (93.7%), ÀÌ°Í°ú ¾Ç°üÀý°ú ÀúÀÛ±ÙÀÇ ¾ÐÅë Á¡¼ö ÇÕ°úÀÇ »ó°ü¼ºÀº ³·¾Ò´Ù(Kendall tau = 0.084). ÀÌ¿Í ´ëÁ¶ÀûÀ¸·Î ȯÀÚ°¡ º¸°íÇÏ´Â ÅëÁõÀÇ Á¿ìÃø À§Ä¡´Â ÀÓ»ó°Ë»ç °á°ú¿Í °ü·Ã¼ºÀÌ ³ô¾Ò´Ù(¿ìÃø ÅëÁõ p£¼0.001, ÁÂÃø ÅëÁõ p£¼0.001). ¾Ç°üÀý ÀâÀ½Àº ȯÀÚ°¡ Áõ»óÀ¸·Î ÀÎÁöÇÏ´Â Ãø°ú ÀÓ»ó°Ë»ç ¼Ò°ß °£¿¡ »ó´çÇÑ ÀÏÄ¡¸¦ º¸¿´´Ù(kappa = 0.482). °³±¸Á¦ÇÑÀ» È£¼ÒÇϴ ȯÀÚ´Â ¼¼°¡Áö °³±¸·® ÃøÁ¤°ª ¸ðµÎ¿¡¼­ ±×·¸Áö ¾ÊÀº ȯÀÚº¸´Ù ¾à 10 §®°¡ ÀûÀº °³±¸·®À» º¸¿´´Ù(p£¼0.001).

°á·Ð : ÅÎÀÇ ÅëÁõ, ¾Ç°üÀý ÀâÀ½ ¹× °³±¸Á¦ÇÑÀº ÃøµÎÇϾÇÀå¾Ö ȯÀÚÀÇ ÁÖ¼Ò¿Í °ü·ÃµÈ ÁÖ¿äÇÑ Áõ»óÀ̾ú´Ù. ȯÀÚ°¡ º¸°íÇÏ´Â ÅëÁõ ºÎÀ§¿Í ¾Ç°üÀý ÀâÀ½ ¹× °³±¸Á¦ÇÑÀÌ ÀÓ»ó°Ë»ç °á°ú¿Í Áߵ ³»Áö ³ôÀº ÀÏÄ¡¼ºÀ» º¸ÀÓÀ¸·Î¼­ °¡Àå ½Å·ÚÇÒ ¸¸ÇÑ Ç׸ñÀ¸·Î Æò°¡µÇ¾ú´Ù.

Objectives: This study aimed to assess the characteristics of temporomandibular disorder (TMD) symptoms and to determine the correspondence between TMD symptoms and clinical examination findings.

Materials and Methods : A total of 218 patients (143 females and 75 males; age = 31.3 ¡¾ 14.0) were enrolled in this study who completed a questionnaire and underwent a clinical examination and radiographic assessment. Patients were asked about all the symptoms and complaints, including onset or duration, and locations of the symptoms. Clinical examination included amounts of mouth opening, palpable temporomandibular joint (TMJ) sounds, and tenderness to palpation of the TMJ and all masticatory muscles. Tenderness scores obtained from palpation of the masticatory system were su§®ated to define the variables for further analysis.

Results: Pain was the most frequently reported symptom (78.9%), followed by joint sounds (45.4%), and limitation in mouth opening (17.0%). Jaw pain comprised 91.9% of pain complaints. The subjective intensity of jaw pain was low to medium in most patients (93.7%), but it was poorly correlated with the sum of tenderness scores of the TMJ and masticatory muscles (Kendall tau = 0.084). In contrast, the side in which pain was reported by patients was well associated with the clinical examination results (pain of the right side, p £¼ 0.001, and left side, p £¼ 0.001). There was moderate agreement in TMJ sounds between the side identified by patients as symptomatic and clinical examination findings (kappa = 0.482). Finally, patients who complained of restricted mouth opening showed about a 10 §® less opening in all three measurements, compared to other patients (p £¼ 0.001).

Conclusion: The most frequent symptoms reported by TMD patients were jaw pain, TMJ sounds, and mouth opening limitation. The side of jaw pain, the side of TMJ sounds, and the presence of opening limitation were highly concordant between symptom reports and examination findings.

Å°¿öµå

ÃøµÎÇϾÇÀå¾Ö;¡ÈÄ ¹× Áõ»ó;½Åü°Ë»ç
Temporomandibular disorders;Signs and symptoms;Physical examination

¿ø¹® ¹× ¸µÅ©¾Æ¿ô Á¤º¸

  

µîÀçÀú³Î Á¤º¸

KCI